Back to research

Tax Planning

Tax Planning in the Era of Global Minimum Tax: What Individuals and Multinationals Need to Know

With the OECD/G20 global minimum tax (GMT) framework and U.S. legislative reforms changing cross-border tax exposure, both individuals and MNEs need proactive planning to navigate rising compliance and tax costs.

By NomadicTax Research Team · 5-8 min read

The New Global Minimum Tax Landscape

The global tax environment has been irreversibly altered by the introduction and implementation of the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules, part of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework’s Pillar 2. These rules establish a 15% minimum effective tax rate for multinational enterprises (MNEs) with consolidated revenues above €750 million. (imf.org)

Parallel to this, Cyprus implemented reforms effective January 1, 2026, raising its corporate tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, aligning with GMT, extending loss carry-forward periods, and changing dividend taxation. (elibrary.imf.org)

Planning Opportunities and Risks

What entities can do:

  • Review incentive regimes and tax holidays: Under GMT, purely profit-based incentives that drop effective tax rates below 15% may be neutralized; incentives tied to asset-investment, R&D, or employment may still be meaningful. (imf.org)
  • Structure operations with substance: Maintain adequate operations, employees, and business activity in jurisdictions to avoid being classified as shell entities subject to Global Top-Up Tax.
  • Reevaluate existing structures: For Cyprus’s reforms, abolishing deemed dividend distributions and sharply reducing withholding on actual dividends change cash flow for shareholders. Review profit repatriation strategies. (elibrary.imf.org)

For individuals (especially highly-mobile or expatriates):

  • Watch for changes in how business profits and dividends will be taxed under GMT or country-specific rules.
  • Consider residency and the source of income more closely—rental, royalties, or digital income across borders may draw into scope.
  • For stock options in jurisdictions like Cyprus taxed at 8%, favorable compared to high employment income rates; these may be embraced more widely. (elibrary.imf.org)

Practical Examples

  • Example A – A U.S.-headed MNE: Under Pillar 2, taxed in its home country via Income Inclusion Rule (IIR); U.S. legislative changes may tax foreign earnings at modestly higher rates, but allow more generous foreign tax credits. Dual exposure: domestic top-up tax plus conditional credits abroad. (imf.org)

  • Example B – SME in Cyprus: Crypto gains taxed at 8% flat; stock options taxed similarly under arms-length employer scheme. Use of such regimes may preserve attraction to high-skilled individuals. Personal income tax thresholds increased to €22,000; brackets adjusted for inflation. (elibrary.imf.org)

Actionable Checklist for 2026-27

StepWhat to DoWhy It Matters Under GMT & Latest Reforms
Tax Jurisdiction AuditIdentify where your companies, operations, and employees are registered or carry out workTo assess exposure to IIR/UTPR / source-country taxation changes
Incentives ReviewList all profit-based incentives to see if they push below 15%; evaluate asset- and employment-based onesProfit-based incentives often get overridden under GMT; others may still deliver value
Investment Return StructuringPlan dividend withholding, repatriation, and share-holding entities in jurisdictions with favorable rulesAs with Cyprus reforms, rates may drop for actual dividends; non-domicile regimes may survive
Remote Work PoliciesDocument where employees work, part-time remote abroad; ensure policies reflect OECD Model commentaryTo avoid unexpected permanent establishment exposure (see related article)

Final Thoughts

While the global minimum tax rules and country reforms are increasing complexity, they also offer clarity. With well-defined planning around entity location, investment incentives, and operational substance, individuals and businesses can minimize risks and leverage favorable regimes. The new tax order rewards transparency, substance, and long-term structure over aggressive tax arbitrage.

Sources

Structured source metadata was not recorded; see citations in the article body.