Back to research

Case Studies

Case Study: Using Low-Carbon LNG Asset Expensing & Tax Credits to Improve Project Viability

An in-depth example showing how new Canadian policy on accelerated capital cost allowance and CCUS tax credit can make low-carbon LNG projects more attractive.

By NomadicTax Research Team · 5-8 min read

Background & Policy Changes

Canada’s Spring Economic Update 2026 introduced two major measures that benefit energy projects:

  • Accelerated Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) reinstated for eligible low-carbon liquefied natural gas (LNG) equipment and non-residential buildings—50% for Class 47 liquefaction equipment and 10% for Class 1 buildings. Eligible assets acquired on or after November 4, 2025, up to end of 2034. (budget.canada.ca)
  • Investment Tax Credit for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) expanded: adding uses such as enhanced oil recovery (at reduced rates), with different credit rates for capture equipment versus transportation/storage. (pwc.com)

Project Setup: Example

Acme LNG Inc. plans a new facility to produce low-carbon LNG. It will include liquefaction equipment, storage, buildings, plus CCUS infrastructure.

  • Facility emission threshold: To qualify for the accelerated CCA, facility must meet emissions intensity ≤ 0.20 tCO₂e/tLNG. Acme’s design plan shows 0.18 so it qualifies.
  • Asset purchases: 25% of project cost in liquefaction equipment (Class 47), 15% in non-res buildings (Class 1), 10% in capture system, 20% in transport/storage.

Tax Treatment & Financial Impact

ComponentPolicy AppliedQuantitative Effect
Liquefaction equipment (Class 47)50% accelerated CCAInstead of standard depreciation (say 8-15%), can write off half of cost faster; cash-flow advantage in early years
Non-residential buildings (Class 1)10% accelerated CCAMore depreciation up front vs slower build-up of capital base
CCUS capture equipment50-60% refundable ITCReduces net cost dramatically; with high capture credit, gets back up to 60% of eligible cost
Transport/storage/EOR useLower rates for non-capture elements; enhanced credit for certain uses including EORBenefit but less generous—still material savings

Example: on a $100M cost split as above, net tax savings equivalent to ~$30-40M in early years when combining CCA accelerations & ITCs, improving Internal Rate of Return by several percentage points.


Steps to Leverage These Policies

  • Certify emissions intensity: Submit engineering study to Minister of Energy & Natural Resources. Without it, facility won't qualify. (budget.canada.ca)
  • Time asset acquisitions: Assets must be acquired between Nov 4, 2025 and end of 2034 to be eligible. Plan procurement accordingly.
  • Classify assets properly: Class 47 for liquefaction equipment, Class 1 for buildings; ensure design/build structure matches requirements.
  • Choose CCUS equipment types wisely: Capture vs transport/storage/EOR—credit rates differ. Use higher-rate capture where possible.
  • Engage with professional advisors: Tax, engineering, environmental specialists to document compliance, capture credits, and amortization schedules.

Risks & Considerations

  • If emissions threshold is missed or modified, you may lose accelerated CCA.
  • Delays in procurement might push asset acquisition outside eligible period.
  • CCUS investments rely on regulation clarity and operational capacity. Uncertainty remains around performance, permitting, costs.
  • Cash flow timing: large upfront CAPEX still requires financing; tax benefits may lag.

Bottom line: For companies in clean energy, especially LNG and CCUS, this policy shift makes low-carbon projects much more financially viable. Early action, meticulous planning, and compliance with eligibility rules turn these new policies into competitive advantage.

Sources

Structured source metadata was not recorded; see citations in the article body.